Reflecting on Early Training
When I think about ‘beyond assessment’, my mind returns to my initial experiences and early training. In bodywork disciplines—be it physiotherapy, massage therapy, or osteopathy—the foundational skills involve assessing individual muscles or groups of muscles to identify sources of pain or restricted movement.
Chronic Pain and the Assessment Process
Throughout my remedial massage education, I learned how to assess both rotator cuff injuries and issues with bicep function. We also learned the importance of measuring the range of motion when investigating joint pain, as well as how to assess for restriction and discomfort in both the lumbar and cervical spine.
While curiosity was supported, I frequently questioned how many individuals genuinely adopted this mindset, developed confidence in their professional responsibilities, and prioritized sustained growth over short-term results.
Curiosity in Practice
Take, for example, a rotator cuff injury. Sometimes, the underlying issue might be that the ribs are not moving as they should. This required us to nurture our own curiosity and question why the rotator cuff was presenting problems. Our focus was on repairing the rotator cuff, not necessarily on exploring the broader context.
Expanding Understanding Through Practice
After qualifying and starting my practice, I attended workshops to broaden my technique repertoire. This journey led me to a deeper appreciation of what assessment truly entails, moving beyond just the basics. Developing a deeper understanding of my anatomy and connections within the body, that muscles can function as synergists, antagonists and agonists, as well as solo action and combined action.
The Four Guidelines of Assessment
- Subjective
- Objective
- Assessment
- Plan
These four pillars formed the basis of my assessment approach. They provided a guiding framework—an anchor—for evaluating and treating the person before me. The plan I developed often felt adaptable, changing rapidly based on the patient’s response. Over time, I began to cultivate skills that extended beyond the assessment itself.
Skills Beyond Assessment
- Silencing the critical inner voice
- Listening to subtle cues in the subjective assessment
- Tuning into the body’s rhythm and energy
- Recognizing when the body signals that treatment is sufficient or when an innovative approach is needed
Assessment as an Anchor
My assessments and plans became my anchor. The initial plan, shaped by the assessment, might evolve depending on how the individual responded to treatment and their neurological functioning. This anchor often pointed to a deeper narrative behind injury or chronic pain.
Questioning and Adapting
It is essential to remain open to challenging our own findings and determining the next steps. Adapting is part of the process; I do not charge for changes in my understanding, as these are natural components of effective practice.
The Broader Context of Pain and Injury
Pain and injury rarely exist in a vacuum. These factors frequently intersect with emotional stress, lifestyle decisions, and social conditions, each of which can significantly influence an individual’s experience of discomfort or recovery. Understanding pain means looking beyond the surface symptoms and appreciating the impact of daily routines, work demands, sleep quality, and even the person’s support network.
By placing each case within its broader context, I am better able to appreciate the complex interplay between physical symptoms and external influences. This holistic perspective enables more effective, empathetic care, ensuring that treatment plans are responsive to the whole person rather than just the immediate injury.
Chronic Pain and the Assessment Process
When treating someone with persistent pain, headaches, or shoulder issues that have resisted previous interventions, I share with the patient that their pain signals dysfunction or a need for healing. We must find a way in—assessing neck pain or headaches physically, then drawing on the confidence to consider neurological and historical factors. The assessments reveal restricted movements and provide insight into what is happening.
Variety in Injuries
In certain cases, the concern may involve a routine running injury or an issue related to the back. Others may have sustained injuries by lifting heavy objects, tripping, or being involved in accidents. Each case is unique, and assessment must adapt accordingly.
In conclusion assessment is not a static process; it serves as a foundation from which meaningful treatment can evolve. As practitioners, we must continually reflect on the underlying causes and remain attentive to the subtle cues each patient provides. This approach fosters a deeper understanding and builds trust, allowing for more targeted interventions that address both physical and psychological aspects of pain.





